Separating the thinking activity from decision making

The process of separating the thinking activity from decision making involves distinct phases that allow for thorough analysis before committing to a course of action.

Phase 1: Critical Thinking and Analysis

This initial phase focuses on exploring the problem and potential solutions without making any decisions, this is all about preparation and foresight.

Identify the Problem

• Clearly define the issue that needs to be addressed

• Gather relevant information and data

Generate Options

• Brainstorm potential solutions without judgment

• Consider unconventional or creative approaches

Analyze Alternatives

• Evaluate pros and cons of each option

• Use logic to assess potential outcomes

• Consider context and external factors

Challenge Assumptions

• Question conventional wisdom

• Look for biases or flawed reasoning

During this phase, encourage open debate, diverse perspectives, and thorough examination of the issue. The goal is to think critically and expansively about the problem and potential solutions without making decisions, so you are prepared and ready when the time arises to make a decision.

Phase 2: Decision Making

Once the analysis is complete, transition to the decision-making phase:

Review Assumptions

• Review assumptions made when analysis was done

• Adjust alternatives if preconditions have changed

Select the Best Option

• Based on the analysis, choose the most promising solution

• Commit to a clear course of action

Develop an Implementation Plan

• Create concrete steps to execute the decision

• Assign responsibilities and timelines

Communicate the Decision

• Clearly explain the rationale to stakeholders

• Address concerns and get buy-in

In this phase, the focus shifts from analysis to action. Once assumptions have been reviewed avoid reopening debates from Phase 1 - the decision has been made and the priority is now effective execution

Phase 3: Evaluation

After implementation, revisit the decision:

Assess Outcomes

• Gather data on results and impacts

• Compare actual outcomes to expected outcomes

Identify Lessons Learned

• Analyze what worked well and what didn't

• Use insights to improve future decision-making

This phase allows for objective evaluation of the decision and process, without reverting to "I told you so" arguments

Key Principles

• Clearly delineate the thinking/analysis phase from the decision-making phase

• In Phase 1, encourage debate and diverse viewpoints

• In Phase 2, commit fully to implementation without second-guessing

• Use Phase 3 to learn and improve, not assign blame

By separating these phases, you create space for thorough analysis and critical thinking before committing to action. This can lead to better decisions and more effective outcomes.